Answers
When there is variable wastage,
SL
and SR
will have increased variance, so
SL−SR
will have increased variance as well.
Hence the answer to part (e) will increase.
Full solutions
(a)
Let L
and R
denote the length, in metres, of a randomly chosen
Long and Regular wooden plank, respectively.
L∼N(1.82,0.22)P(L<1.79)=0.440 (3 sf)■
(b)
E(L1+⋯+L8)=8E(L)=14.56
Var(L1+⋯+L8)=8Var(L)=0.32
L1+⋯+L8∼N(14.56,0.32000)P(L1+⋯+L8>14.5)=0.542 (3 sf)■
(c)
L∼N(1.82,0.22)P(R>1.25)=0.46017
Expected number of planks=120×0.46017=55.2 (3 sf)■
(d)
Let
D=L1+⋯+L10−(R1+⋯+R16)
E(D)=10E(L)−16E(R)=−1.32
Var(D)=10Var(L)+16Var(R)=1.84
D∼N(−1.3200,1.84)
P(∣D∣<0.65)=P(−0.65<D<0.65)=0.237 (3 sf)■
(e)
Let SL
and SR
denote the length of a Short plank obtained by cutting the Long and Regular planks, respectively.
SL∼N(31.82,320.22)SL∼N(0.60667,0.0044444)SR∼N(21.22,220.32)SR∼N(0.61,0.022500)
SL−SR∼N(−0.0033333,0.026944)
P(SL>SR)=P(SL−SR>0)=0.492 (3 sf)■
(f)
When there is variable wastage,
SL
and SR
will have increased variance, so
SL−SR
will have increased variance as well.
Hence Hence the answer to part (e) will increase ■
Question Commentary
Parts (a) to (e) are relatively straightforward normal distribution questions,
testing the use of our GC along with calculating the mean and variance of new distributions like
X1+X2
and 2X.
Part (f) links to theoretical knowledge, where I suspect any reasonable explanation will suffice (eg
if the wastage of each cut is a fixed amount that is the same for all planks, the answer to part (e) will
not change. However, I believe this scenario is less likely than the increased variance answer we have suggested
above).
To see why an increased variance will cause the answer to part (e) to increase, we recommend
sketching out a normal distribution and locating the region representing part (e). Increasing the variance
means that the normal curve will be more spread out, leading to a larger area under the curve.