There is sufficient evidence at the 5% level of significance to conclude that
the squirrels on the island have a different mean tail length as the species known to her
Full solutions
(i)
Let μ denote the population mean tail length of the squirrel species known to the zoologist, and
H0 and H1 be the null and alternative hypothesis respectively.
H0:μ=14.0 H1:μ=14.0■
(ii)
Under H0,
Z=nσX−μ∼N(0,1)
For the test to not reject the null hypothesis,
−1.9600<203.8x−14<1.960012.3<x<15.7 (3 sf)
Set of values of x:
{x∈R:12.3<x<15.7}■
(iii)
Since x=15.8 lies outside of the
set found in (ii), the null hypothesis is rejected.
Hence there is sufficient evidence at the 5% level of significance to conclude that
the squirrels on the island have a different mean tail length as the species known to her. ■